シルクマーケット

The secondary research process involved comprehensive analysis of agricultural commodity databases, sericultural statistics, peer-reviewed textile journals, and authoritative trade organizations. Key sources included the International Sericultural Commission (ISC), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Central Silk Board of India, China National Silk Association, International Silk Association (ISA), US Department of Commerce Office of Textiles and Apparel (OTEXA), European Apparel and Textile Confederation (EURATEX), UNCTAD Commodity Market Analysis, International Trade Centre (ITC) Trade Map, UN Comtrade Database, World Textile Information Network (WTiN), Textile Exchange Industry Reports, Silk Association of Great Britain, Japan Silk Foundation, National Bureau of Statistics of China, Indian Ministry of Textiles Annual Reports, and national agriculture ministry sericultural departments from key producing regions. These sources were utilized to collect cocoon production statistics, raw silk output data, export-import trade flows, price trend analysis, sustainability certification standards (OEKO-TEX, GOTS), and technological advancements in reeling and weaving processes across mulberry silk, tasar silk, muga silk, and eri silk categories.

As part of the initial research process, stakeholders from both the supply and demand sides were interviewed to get both qualitative and quantitative information about the whole value chain, from growing mulberries to selling finished luxury goods. On the supply side, there were managing directors of silk reeling mills, heads of sericultural farms, managers of mulberry plantations, heads of textile mill operations, managers of silk dyeing facilities, and sustainability officers from silk cooperatives in major producing areas. Chief procurement officers from high-end fashion houses, textile sourcing heads from interior design firms, R&D directors from cosmetics companies that use silk proteins, category managers from high-end department stores, and supply chain directors from clothing manufacturers were some of the demand-side sources. Primary research confirmed the division of products into categories like silk fabric, threads, yarns, and dyes. It also confirmed the timing of artisanal versus industrial production and gave information on the use of sustainable sericulture methods, price changes based on cocoon quality grades, and the dynamics of omnichannel distribution for silk textiles versus silk-infused cosmetics.

Primary Respondent Breakdown:

By Designation: C-level Primaries (40%), Director Level (25%), Others (35%)

By Region: Asia-Pacific (40%), Europe (25%), North America (25%), Rest of World (10%)

Global market valuation was derived through production volume mapping and revenue analysis across the sericultural value chain. The methodology included:

Identification of 60+ key stakeholders across silk reeling, silk fabric weaving, silk thread manufacturing, and specialty silk dyeing sectors in China, India, Uzbekistan, Brazil, Japan, and European processing markets

Product mapping across mulberry silk, tasar silk, muga silk, and eri silk categories, with granular segmentation by application (textiles, home furnishings, apparel, accessories) and end-use industry (fashion, interior design, cosmetics, medical)

Analysis of reported and modeled annual revenues specific to raw silk trading, silk fabric production, and value-added silk derivatives

Coverage of manufacturers, cooperatives, and trading houses representing 75-80% of global market share in 2024

Extrapolation using bottom-up (cocoon output × conversion yield × ASP by silk grade and country) and top-down (manufacturer revenue validation against trade statistics) approaches to derive segment-specific valuations, accounting for differential pricing between 5A-grade mulberry silk versus wild silk varieties and processed silk fabric markup ratios