デジタルパソロジー市場では、この技術セグメントはホールスライドイメージングによって主にリードされており、48% の市場シェアを保持し、導入に関して最大の貢献者としての地位を確立しています。 WSI に続いて、仮想顕微鏡は市場でかなりのシェアを占めていますが、専門家に柔軟な表示オプションを提供しています。 人工知能 (AI) は、診断の精度と効率を高める上でその役割が急速に成長していることで注目に値しており、医療機関は AI ソリューションをワークフローに統合する必要に迫られています。テクノロジーの多様性は、イノベーションとユーザーのニーズによって推進される競争環境を促進します。 スライド全体のイメージング市場は、市場で支配的な技術として認識されており、病理学者が分析と診断のためにスライド全体をデジタル化できるようになります。その強力な導入は、効率的なワークフロー ソリューションの必要性と医療現場でのデジタル プラットフォームへの移行によって推進されています。 一方で、人工知能は急速に台頭しており、画像分析を自動化し、予測的な洞察を提供することで従来の病理学の実践を変革しています。 AI ベースのテクノロジーを組み込むことで、診断の精度が向上し、所要時間が短縮され、遠隔診断が可能になることが期待されており、現代の病理学における基本的なコンポーネントとなる可能性が示されています。
Ventana Medical Systems は、複数の腫瘍センターに導入された AI 支援病理ソリューションにより、がん診断のリーダーシップをサポートしています。検証済みの診断プラットフォームは腫瘍検出の精度を高め、臨床ワークフローを合理化し、世界中のがん研究や病院ベースの診断環境での強力な採用を強化します。
PathAI は、150 以上の臨床検査室に統合された AI を活用した診断プラットフォームを通じて、病院ベースのデジタル病理学の導入を強化します。これらのソリューションは、診断の精度を向上させ、所要時間を短縮し、大規模な病院のワークフローをサポートし、世界中の医療診断エコシステムにおけるデジタル変革を強化します。
Huron Digital Pathology は、複数の医療システムにわたる画像管理と診断ワークフローの最適化を可能にするソフトウェア ソリューションを提供します。そのプラットフォームはスケーラブルな病理データ処理をサポートし、世界中の臨床検査機関や診断研究機関での業務効率を向上させ、デジタル導入を加速します。
An accomplished research analyst with high proficiency in market forecasting, data visualization, competitive benchmarking, and others. He holds a pronounced track record in research and consulting projects for sectors such as life sciences, medical devices, and healthcare IT. His capabilities in qualitative and quantitative analysis have resulted in positive client outcomes. Working on niche market trends, opportunities, sales, and forecasted value is part of his skill set.
read more
Co-Author
Rahul Gotadki
Research Manager
He holds an experience of about 9+ years in Market Research and Business Consulting, working under the spectrum of Life Sciences and Healthcare domains. Rahul conceptualizes and implements a scalable business strategy and provides strategic leadership to the clients. His expertise lies in market estimation, competitive intelligence, pipeline analysis, customer assessment, etc.
The secondary research process involved comprehensive analysis of regulatory databases for medical devices and in vitro diagnostics, peer-reviewed pathology journals, clinical informatics publications, and authoritative healthcare technology organizations. Key sources included the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) Clearance Database and De Novo Pathway Records, European Medicines Agency (EMA) Medical Device Regulations, Health Canada Medical Device Active License Listing, College of American Pathologists (CAP) Guidelines and Accreditation Programs, Digital Pathology Association (DPA) White Papers and Standards, American Society of Clinical Pathology (ASCP) Workforce Reports, European Society of Pathology (ESP) Digital Pathology Committee Reports, National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Cancer Institute (NCI) Imaging Data Commons, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI/PubMed) for computational pathology studies, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR), World Health Organization (WHO) Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Health Statistics, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Standards Committee Pathology Working Group, and national health informatics agency reports from key markets. These sources were used to collect regulatory clearance data for whole slide imaging scanners, AI/ML algorithm validations, cancer incidence statistics driving diagnostic demand, laboratory automation trends, telepathology adoption rates, and interoperability standards compliance for digital pathology workflows.
Primary Research
Qualitative and quantitative insights were obtained by interviewing supply-side and demand-side stakeholders during the primary research process. The supply-side sources consist of CEOs, VPs of Engineering, Chief Medical Officers, regulatory affairs chiefs, and commercial directors from whole slide scanner manufacturers, pathology information system vendors, AI diagnostic algorithm developers, and cloud pathology platform providers. The demand-side sources included procurement managers from academic medical centers, community hospital networks, independent diagnostic laboratories, contract research organizations (CROs), and national cancer institutes, as well as Chief Pathologists, pathology department chairs, laboratory medical directors, and digital pathology implementation leads. Market segmentation was validated across hardware, software, and services through primary research. Additionally, AI algorithm development pipelines were confirmed, and insights were gathered on scanner replacement cycles, cloud storage migration patterns, laboratory information system (LIS) integration challenges, and reimbursement pathways for digital pathology procedures.
Primary Respondent Breakdown:
By Designation: C-level Primaries (32%), Director Level (35%), Others (33%)
By Region: North America (32%), Europe (30%), Asia-Pacific (28%), Rest of World (10%)
Market Size Estimation
Global market valuation was derived through revenue mapping of installed base and recurring service contracts. The methodology included:
Identification of 40+ key manufacturers across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America specializing in slide scanners, image management software, and AI analytics platforms
Product mapping across whole slide imaging hardware, virtual microscopy software, artificial intelligence algorithms, and integrated storage solutions
Analysis of reported and modeled annual revenues specific to digital pathology portfolios, including hardware sales, software licenses, and maintenance contracts
Coverage of manufacturers representing 70-75% of global market share in 2024
Extrapolation using bottom-up (installed scanner base × annual service contract value + new equipment sales by country) and top-down (manufacturer revenue validation against total addressable pathology laboratory market) approaches to derive segment-specific valuations for software, hardware, and service components across hospital, diagnostic laboratory, and research institute end users
“This is really good guys. Excellent work on a tight deadline. I will continue to use you going forward and recommend you to others. Nice job”
Noah MalgeriCo-Founder
“Thanks. It’s been a pleasure working with you, please use me as reference with any other Intel employees.”
Joseph AguayoSales Operations & Pricing Manager
“Thanks for sending the report it gives us a good global view of the Betaïne market.”
Peter Groot koerkampAccount and Business Manager
“Thank you, this will be very helpful for OQS.”
La Terria DoddProgram Support Specialist
“We found the report very insightful! we found your research firm very helpful. I'm sending this email to secure our future business.”
Younghwan ChoiSenior Retail Manager
“I am very pleased with how market segments have been defined in a relevant way for my purposes (such as "Portable Freezers & refrigerators" and "last-mile").
In general the report is well structured. Thanks very much for your efforts.”
Mark IrwinManagement Consultant
“I have been reading the first document or the study, ,the Global HVAC and FP market report 2021 till 2026. Must say, good info! I have not gone in depth at all parts, but got a good indication of the data inside!”
Rob KooikerGroup Product Manager HVAC & Fire Protection GMA
“We got the report in time, we really thank you for your support in this process. I also thank to all of your team as they did a great job.”
Akif MorogluStrategy & Business Development Director
“The Automotive 48V ECU Components Procurement Intelligence Study” was a complex project, but the Market Research Future (MRFR) team handled it with quality, agility, and customer-centricity. They delivered all requested data on time and within the agreed scope. The team, including Shubhendra Anand and Rahul Gotadki, was always readily available to clarify questions and swiftly implement necessary adjustments, driving the project to a successful conclusion within a very demanding timeframe.
I would also like to specifically commend Akshay Agarwal for his responsiveness and support at every stage—from our initial inquiry on May 6th through to final delivery on June 18th. His dedication made the entire process seamless.”
Guilherme Gomes MartinsProduct Management Director